#144 +ℓℓ
In #140 we looked at whose speech was most unusual in terms of proportion of different parts-of-speech.
Now we look at what parts-of-speech are unusually frequent or infrequent for certain speakers.
A positive number means more frequent than expected and a negative number means less frequent than expected.
Steve Hatch
Proper Nouns PROPN: +3.44
—
DuBois
—
Interjections INTJ: -3.17
Ms. Xi
Numbers NUM: +4.39
Proper Nouns PROPN: +3.03
—
Bob Redell
Determiners DET: +4.40
—
Sandra Elias
Proper Nouns PROPN: +5.69
—
Dimitri
Numbers NUM: +4.00
—
Leclerc
—
Interjections INTJ: -3.29
Dr. Lokken
Determiners DET: +5.93
Prepositions ADP: +3.26
—
Pronouns PRON: -3.39
Interjections INTJ: -4.72
Stratt
Determiners DET: +4.51
Prepositions ADP: +4.44
Proper Nouns PROPN: +4.17
—
Interjections INTJ: -8.73
Computer
Numbers NUM: +10.61
Nouns NOUN: +5.41
—
Adverbs ADV: -3.64
Grace
Interjections INTJ: +11.52
Pronouns PRON: +4.00
—
Adjectives ADJ: -3.11
Proper Nouns PROPN: -5.62
Nouns NOUN: -6.17
Rocky
Nouns NOUN: +12.04
Adjectives ADJ: +8.84
—
Coordinating Conjunctions CCONJ: -3.27
Pronouns PRON: -3.51
Particles PART: -3.66
Auxiliaries AUX: -3.91
Prepositions ADP: -5.83
Determiners DET: -15.10
Part-of-speech tagging was done with spaCy. The tagging uses Universal POS tags.
Tags PUNCT, SPACE, SYM, and X were ignored.
The numbers shown are the standard residual (O - E) / √E and are only listed if the absolute value is ≥3.